Name of the Case : Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras
Year of Judgement : 1950
Popular Name : Cross Roads case
Related Topic/ Issue : Freedom of the press
Related Article/ Schedule : 19
Supreme Court Judgement
- The Supreme Court held that the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) includes the freedom of propagation of ideas.
- It ruled that freedom of circulation is essential for the freedom of speech and expression.
- The court stated that without liberty of circulation, publication would be of little value.
- The Madras government's order banning the entry and circulation of the weekly English journal "Cross Roads" published in Bombay was declared unconstitutional and void.
- The banning order was issued under Section 9 (1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949.
- The Supreme Court observed that freedom of speech and freedom of the press are fundamental to democratic organizations.
- It emphasized that without free political discussion, public education, which is essential for the proper functioning of popular government, is not possible.
Impact of the Judgement
- As a sequel to this judgement, the 1st Amendment Act (1951) added "public order" as a reasonable restriction under Article 19(2) on the freedom of speech and expression.
- The Supreme Court held that restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression could be imposed only on the grounds mentioned in Article 19(2).
- The court refused to permit restrictions on the ground of public order because it was not mentioned in Article 19(2) before the amendment.
- The court stated that ordinary or local breaches of public order were not grounds for imposing restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression.
- It further observed that the term "public order" has a wide connotation and signifies the state of tranquility which prevails among members of a political society as a result of internal regulations enforced by the government.