Consider the following statements regarding the qualifications of a person for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India: 1. The person has to be, for at least five years, a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession. 2. The person has to be, for at least ten years, an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession. 3. The person is, in the opinion of the Chief Justice of India, a distinguised jurist. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Consider the following statements: 1.The mode of removal of a Judge of a High Court in India is same as that of removal of a Judge of the Supreme Court. 2. After retirement from the office, a permane…

Consider the following statements : 1. The Advocate General of a State in India is appointed by the President ot India upon the recommendation of the Governor of the concerned State. 2. As provided i…

Which of the following statements regarding the Advisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is correct? (1) It is binding on the Supreme Court to give its opinion on any matter referred to it by the P…

Consider the following sentences about writ jurisdiction in India. 1. The writ jurisdiction is a form of original jurisdiction and not appellate jurisdiction. 2. It can be issued either by High Court…

With reference to the Constitution of India, consider the following statements: 1. No High Court shall have the jurisdiction to declare any central law to be constitutionally invalid. 2. An amendment…